Pages

Subscribe:

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Chapter 9


Chapter 9: Make the News Comprehensive and Proportional

The news must be representative of all types of people.  It must be comprehensive on a certain level and proportionally.  In the 1980’s newspapers began to write to only the higher educated part of society, because they believed if they didn’t, they would lose advertisers and thus, money.  This strategy however didn’t make much investment in the youth of America. Stories were long and sophisticated, “some even required college degrees to follow” (Elements p.211).  This resulted in a very small demographic of people reading the newspaper, and so they were getting way too much information, it turned into a snowball effect.  Here is an article explaining how the newspapers began to be this way in the 1980’s:

There was a survey done that was referred to in the book that showed that viewers preferred a wider variety of topics.  Here is another study that further verifies this statement:

Another aspect of journalism that this chapter explains is “the naked body” effect.  How often do businesses do something dramatic and extreme in order to draw attention to themselves and gather a crowd and thus, increase income.  The book says the following “ A news organization has to operate, to some extent, according to a faith or philosophy, since empirical models of the past may not work in the future.” Here is an article that explains how Hurricane Irene was hyped much more than it actually turned out to be:

We as journalists should shy away from the “naked” effect, and tell the truth without hyping up a story too much.  

Chapter 8


Chapter 8 Engagement and Relevance
            “Journalists must make the significant interesting and relevant.”
This chapter tells a very interesting story of a reporter named Diana Sugg, who went into great depth to follow the story of a dying boy by the name of R.J. Voigt in order to show how hard it is for a sick child to die in America.  She said, “Too often we tell the tale of a person just because it’s a great tale.  We need to not just go seize on following a kid with cancer just to see how it goes, but because there are larger issues.” This story reminded me of a movie that I have seen before, called “My Sister’s Keeper” which is both a novel and a major motion picture that depicted just how hard it is for a sick child to die in America.  Here is a link to the trailer:

It becomes a balancing act between what is engaging and what is relevant, what is fun and fascinating and what is straight-forward news, what people want and what people need to hear.  “Storytelling and information are not contradictory.  They are better understood as two points on a continuum of communicating.”(Elements p 188).  It should be storytelling with a definite purpose.  I decided to research what other people believed regarding this topic, I found an article by Shelly Crutz which verified what the author of “Elements” was saying.  Here is a link to her thoughts:
On the other hand, I found a blog called the Buttry Diary stating why storytelling should be less part of the news.  Here is a link to his blog:
Overall, I believe there should be a balance in all things.  There is nothing wrong with telling stories in the news, because no matter what that is what news is.  However, it should not be so embellished or dramatized that it seems like a soap opera of some sort.  The trick is to find the balance to engage your audience in the relevant topics.  

Monday, December 5, 2011

Do you get religion?


Group 10 addressed the ultimate question: How do you treat religion as a journalist?  How do you completely displace your religion so that it does not affect your reporting or position as a journalist? As group 10 taught, it is impossible to ignore religion completely.  They reminded all of us that although we cannot ignore religion, we need to keep three key things in mind to be as we report: be fair and balanced, make ethical decisions, and continually search for truth. 
            A cool thing that Group 10 showed our class was the website created by Terry Mattingly, getreligion.org.  On this website, Mattingly, along with other editors, search for “ghosts” in articles previously published.  These “ghosts” could be bias, or a truth that is not stated, or any underlying religious context that is not brought forth truthfully.  I think Terry Mattingly has to be an interesting person for creating a website such as this, so I decided to research him a little bit and find his story.  Here is an article that I found: http://www.tmatt.net/
            I liked how group 10 used the video clip of the down syndrome testing to find underlying religious themes in the story that were or were not necessarily transparent or completely fair and balanced.  I found another video clip that has underlying religious issues: